%%%%%%  LATEX Version of TOMACS Review Form %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentstyle[]{article}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.50in}
\setlength{\topmargin}{0cm}
\setlength{\headheight}{0cm}
\setlength{\headsep}{0cm}
\setlength{\textheight}{8.5in}

\begin{document}
\begin{center}
{\bf {\Large ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS)
Review Form}}
\end{center}


Paper Number:

Title:


Author(s):


\rule{6.5in}{.01in}\\

{\bf Section I. Evaluation}\\

\begin{enumerate}

\item
Is the paper of interest to a reasonable segment of the simulation community?\\
---  Yes\\
---  No
\item
Is the paper logically and technically correct?\\
---  Yes\\
---  Appears to be, but didn't check completely\\
---  Only partially (see Section III)\\
---  No
\item
Does the paper make a sufficient contribution to the state-of-the-art so
as to warrant publication in TOMACS?\\
---  Yes\\
---  To a limited extent (See Section III)\\
---  No (see Section III)
\item
Is the title appropriate?\\
---  Yes\\
---  No (see Section III)
\item
Is the abstract an appropriate and adequate digest of the work presented?\\
---  Yes\\
---  No (see Section III)
\item
Does the introduction clearly state the background and/or motivation
in terms understandable to the non-specialist?\\
--- Yes\\
--- Probably (see Section III)\\
--- No (see Section III)
\item
Are the references or bibliography appropriate and complete?\\
--- Yes\\
--- Some additions and/or deletions required (see Section III)\\
--- No (see Section III)
\item
How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?\\
---  Satisfactory\\
---  Could be improved (see Section III)\\
---  Poor (see Section III)
\item
Relative to its technical content and scope, is the length of the
paper appropriate?\\
---  Yes\\
---  No, too long (see Section III)\\
---  No, too short (see Section III)
\item
Is the English satisfactory?\\
---  Yes\\
---  No, but can easily be polished\\
---  No, very poor
\item
How readable is the paper for a reader who is a non-specialist in the field
of this paper?\\
---  Readable with ordinary effort\\
---  Paper is self-contained, but a considerable effort is required\\
---  Difficult\\
---  Unreadable
\end{enumerate}
\rule{6.5in}{.01in}\\
{\bf Section II. Recommendation}\\
---  Accept with no changes\\
---  Accept if certain minor revisions are made\\
---  Author(s) should prepare a major revision for a second review\\
---  Reject\\
\rule{6.5in}{.01in}\\
{\bf Section III. Detailed comments for the author(s)}\\

Please make detailed comments and suggestions for the author(s). 
Constructive comments are an invaluable aid to the author(s) to help
in improving the overall technical quality, utility and readability of the paper.
Use as much space as necessary.

%%% place comments here


\newpage
{\bf Section IV. Comments for the editors, not to be shown to the author(s)}\\

%%% place comments here



Reviewer name:

Reviewer signature:

Date:
\end{document}